Saturday, May 15, 2010

Authority sets aside patent for medicine, gives hope to patient

For the first time in the country, patient groups have won the right, as interested parties, to challenge the patent granted for a medicine.
Delhi Network of Positive People (DNP+), a support group of HIV/AIDS patients, had challenged the patent given to Roche for a drug based on several grounds including that the drug lacked novelty, inventive step and that, being a new form of an old drug, it did not satisfy the requirement of increased therapeutic efficacy as required under section 3(d) of the Indian patent law. The Indian Patent Office at Chennai set aside the patent granted to Roche demonstrating the effectiveness of public health safeguards such as section 3(d) in the Indian patent laws. Roche MD Girish Telang declined to comment on the development when contacted by TOI.


In its decision, the patent office acknowledged that DNP+ was an affected or injured person and had the standing to challenge granted patents. Loon Gangte of DNP+ said, ‘‘The Chennai patent office has set a good precedent. Finally, it has been recognized that patients who are adversely affected by the high prices of medicines have the right to challenge granted patents.’’


The patent office had granted the patent for the drug Valganciclovir to Roche in 2007. Valganciclovir is primarily used as treatment and for prevention of an infection caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV) in organ transplant patients. It is also used to treat cytomegalovirus retinitis, an infection that HIV positive people are susceptible to. Roches’ price for Valganciclovir is Rs 1,040 for a 450mg tablet, or approximately Rs 2,74,560 per patient for a full course of treatment, unaffordable for most people. The decision to set aside the patent is expected to provide much-needed relief as it secures the way for generic competition, which could bring down the price of the drug. Roche was attempting to patent a new form of a drug that was really invented in the 1980s, said Leena Menghaney, project manager of the MSF Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines in India. This decision shows that Section 3(d) of India’s Patents Act, which prevents companies from obtaining unjustified patents, is working. Roche was granted the Valganciclovir patent by the Chennai patent office without hearing the arguments of public interest groups that opposed the granting of the patent.


Setting A Precedent

DNP+, a support group of HIV/AIDS patients, challenged the patent given to Roche for a drug

They alleged drug lacked novelty, inventive step and that it was a new form of an old drug

The Indian Patent Office in Chennai set aside the patent granted to the company

(It was from Times of India, date 15-05-2010)

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Wall Street Reform Day of Action - USA

From folks advocating reform on Wall Street in Manhattan, to those calling their neighbors in Ohio, to senators' offices getting calls from across the country, thousands of OFA supporters in every state spoke out with one voice to demand change.

In Greenville, South Carolina, the headline yesterday was about the 50 OFA supporters who attended a "rally to demand Wall Street reforms." And the Indiana News Center led with "Local Hoosiers 'Call' For Wall Street Reform."

Even better? The stories we got from participants.

Trisha, in Columbus, Wisconsin, called an elderly neighbor. As she tells it, "I asked him if he'd ever contacted a member of Congress. He said 'no' he hadn't. Then after a short pause he said, 'Well, just what was that number? I guess there's a first time for everything. I'll make that call!'"

After meeting in front of the library in Branigan, New Mexico, Evelyn -- an OFA Neighborhood Team Leader -- said that she and other volunteers "talked to people passing by about the importance of standing up to the power brokers and the lobbyists and the big banks. What I love the most is when you really get to have a conversation and inform someone about what's really going on -- they are so appreciative of getting straight-forward information."

And at an event on Wall Street itself, a volunteer named Erin said that "I am here today to stand up for the everyday people who work and raise families and don't want to have their lives disrupted as a result of Wall Street's reckless practices."

Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution Seminar

Practising Law Institute (PLI) will be holding its Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution 2010: A Boot Camp for Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing seminar on June 16-18, 2010 in New York, NY and on July 7-9, 2010 in San Francisco, CA. According to PLI's website, the three-day program, which is directed to patent attorneys, litigation attorneys and patent agents with little patent experience, will focus on teaching the basics of claim drafting, patent application preparation and prosecution, as well as a review of recent developments in the law. The seminar will feature lectures in the morning followed by small clinic sessions in the afternoon, with day 1 focusing on invention disclosures and patent preparation, day 2 on prosecution and issuance, and day 3 on litigation. Lectures will explain:

• How to interview the inventor;
• How to identify the invention;
• How to decide what elements of the invention should be included in the patent;
• How to prosecute an application to result in allowance of an enforceable patent;
• How to interview an Examiner;
• How to use reissues, reexaminations and other post-issuance proceedings; and
• How to anticipate patent litigation issues during the patent prosecution process.

PLI faculty will offer presentations on the following topics:

• Taking Invention Disclosures;
• Overview of Claim Drafting and Preparation of Patent Application;
• Claim Drafting;
• Review of Model Claims;
• Patent Prosecution;
• Conducting the Examiner Interview;
• Review of Model Amendment; and
• Litigation Issues.

A program schedule and list of speakers for the New York Patent Law Institute can be found here, and a program schedule and list of speakers for the San Franscisco Patent Law Institute can be found here.

Practising Law Institute (PLI) #2The registration fee for the conference is $1,795. Those interested in registering for the conference can do so at thePLI website.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Welcome to our Members for Articles, Comments on Posts

Dear Members

I am inviting you to post Articles and Comments etc. relating to IPR's for this blogspot.
Send the articles and comments for this Link: gbredlegal@gmail.com

with regards

Dr.G.B.Reddy

Sunday, May 2, 2010

USTR Releases 2010 Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights

Washington, D.C. – The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) today released its annual “Special 301” Report on the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection of intellectual property rights (IPR). The Special 301 Report provides a means for the United States to communicate its concerns about the need to protect and enforce IPR. Fighting IPR theft in overseas markets is critical to the livelihoods of the estimated 18 million Americans who work in intellectual property-intensive industries.

“Intellectual property theft in overseas markets is an export killer for American businesses and a job killer for American workers here at home. USTR’s Special 301 report is important because it serves as the foundation for a year-round process used to secure meaningful reforms that bolsters our exports and supports American jobs in IPR-intensive industries,” said Ambassador Ron Kirk. “I am pleased that this year’s Special 301 Report will highlight several successes in the fight against intellectual property theft. The Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland have taken significant steps to clamp down on piracy and counterfeiting and will be removed from the Watch List.”

Today’s positive report on these three countries follows recent successes in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, which were the result of consistent engagement using the Special 301 process. The Report also reflects the Administration’s resolve to encourage and maintain effective IPR protection and enforcement worldwide.

Again this year, USTR’s Special 301 Report highlights the prominence of IPR concerns with respect to China.

“We are seriously concerned about China’s implementation of ‘indigenous innovation’ policies that may unfairly disadvantage U.S. IPR holders. Procurement preferences and other measures favoring ‘indigenous innovation’ could severely restrict market access for American technology and products,” said Ambassador Kirk. “Creating an environment that nurtures innovation and entrepreneurship is a worthy goal, but China must maintain a level playing field.”

The Report identifies a wide range of other serious concerns, ranging from the severe problems of piracy and counterfeiting in China, to the challenge of Internet piracy in other countries, to ongoing systemic IPR enforcement shortcomings in many trading partners.

As noted above, key significant developments in this year’s Special 301 Report include the following:

•Czech Republic – The Czech Republic is being removed from the Special 301 Watch List because of significant progress made over the past two years to control effectively its border markets. Moreover, a new criminal code raising the maximum penalties for IPR related crimes from 2 to 8 years imprisonment and criminalizing the manufacture and storage of counterfeit items came into effect January 1, 2010. The United States will continue to monitor whether the new law results in the imposition of deterrent penalties.

•Hungary – Hungary is being removed from the Special 301 Watch List in recognition of the significant improvements on enforcement and other actions taken during the past year. Hungary has taken proactive steps to address the growing threat of Internet piracy, and its customs and police officials have developed their ability to effectively identify infringing products. Through effective and consistent enforcement actions, Hungary has closed its notorious Verseny street market, which was home to an array of illegitimate products. Furthermore, Hungary has taken effective measures to protect IPR, including numerous public awareness-raising campaigns, and training and educational seminars for police, prosecutors, and judges. The United States will continue to monitor Hungary’s progress to ensure that IPR protection and enforcement improvements are ongoing.

•Poland – Poland is being removed from the Special 301 Watch list in recognition of a significant reduction in the availability of pirated and counterfeit goods at border markets, increased and improved enforcement efforts, and strong cooperation between rights holders and enforcement officials. The government has also taken initial steps to address Internet piracy concerns. The United States will continue to monitor Poland’s progress to ensure that IPR protection and enforcement improvements are ongoing.

USTR also announced that it will conduct Out-of-Cycle Reviews for the Philippines and Thailand to monitor progress on specific IPR issues, which will allow us to deepen our IPR dialogue and cooperation with two key trading partners.

BACKGROUND

USTR reviewed 77 trading partners for this year’s Special 301 Report, and placed 41 countries on the Priority Watch List, Watch List, or the Section 306 monitoring list.

The Special 301 designations and actions announced in the Special 301 Report are the result of close consultations with affected stakeholders, interested parties, foreign governments, and Congress, as well as discussions between interested federal agencies.

This year USTR enhanced its public engagement activities, which yielded 571 written comments from interested parties, a significant increase from 2009. USTR made the submissions it received available to the public online at www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2010-0003. In addition, on March 3, 2010, USTR conducted a public hearing to let interested persons inform the interagency Special 301 Subcommittee of issues relevant to the review. The hearing included testimony from 23 witnesses, ranging from foreign governments to industry representatives to non-governmental organizations. A transcript of the hearing is available at http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/1726.

Trading partners on the Priority Watch List do not provide an adequate level of IPR protection or enforcement, or market access for persons relying on intellectual property protection. China, Russia, Algeria, Argentina, Canada, Chile, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Thailand, and Venezuela are on the Priority Watch List. These countries will be the subject of particularly intense engagement through bilateral discussion during the coming year.

Twenty-nine trading partners are on the lower-level Watch List, meriting bilateral attention to address underlying IPR problems: Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Spain, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.

Paraguay will continue to be subject to Section 306 monitoring under a bilateral Memorandum of Understanding that establishes objectives and actions for addressing IPR concerns in that country.

Our process of broad consultations is designed to ensure that Special 301 decisions are based on a robust understanding of often complex intellectual property issues and to help facilitate sound, well-balanced assessments of developments in particular countries. USTR necessarily conducts this assessment on a case-by-case basis, based on the particular facts and circumstances that shape IPR protection and enforcement regimes in specific countries. As discussed in the Report, USTR will continue to work closely with the governments of listed countries.